Does Your Training Reflect Reality?
Author: Jerry MacCauley
Date Posted: October 26, 2006
I was looking at my rather impressive bookcase recently when I
realized that my literary tastes are kind of …dark. I wish that
I was talking about dark, as in vampires or medieval times or even
your basic murder mystery. No, I mean I have books on ancient martial
arts, terrorism, firearms, police officer survival, edge weapons,
stalking and rape prevention, etc. Then, of course, I have the odd
doomsday thrillers. If my home were ever searched, I’m sure I would
end up on the Department of Homeland Security watchlist. I can pull
down a few volumes on how to make improvised explosives, how to
launder money and even how to pick an armored vehicle for family
protection in a violent world. You might think I’m a little paranoid
at first glance, but not exactly…
Since the early eighties, I have been a police instructor tasked
with training officers how to survive a dangerous job using dangerous
tools. Officer survival has become an obsession with me and I decided
early on that the best way for me to pass on this knowledge, was
to actually have the knowledge. All police officers have seen their
share of violence and danger. We have all witnessed horrible crime
scenes and have long since stopped shaking our heads in amazement
that people could treat others with such bizarre and creative forms
of chaos. I enrolled in numerous armed and unarmed response classes
and became in instructor in too many programs to list here.
A few years back, I put together a few thoughts on what I believed
were personal protection skills necessary to help both police and
civilians survive. It was simply listed under three categories:
Awareness, Avoidance and, Defense. I believed then, and still do
to a degree, that if you were in that condition ‘orange’, you could
anticipate most danger and avoid it. Failing in that, there were
some basic things that could be taught, bought or supplied that
would help protect us. It never fails to amaze me how crime and
violence always manages to evolve, keeping us (good guys and protectors)
off balance. Just when you think carrying a pistol with you offers
a great measure of security, some fanatic intentionally drives a
plane into a building. Just when you think that your martial arts
training dollars were a good investment, we find a world of mutants
who don’t respond to pain the way they’re supposed to. I won’t even
get into the suicide bombers at this point in my comments. So, where
are we headed with our survival training today?
At one time in my police career, I was a member of our SWAT team.
We trained for every imaginable scenario we could come up with.
Usually we gleaned some lessons from other agencies failures and
successes. We never really failed ourselves, because we were well
trained, you see. If we could visualize a mission, we would buy
the needed equipment, and seek training. We evolved into paramilitary
team that could solve most problems with firepower, trained negotiators
or just plain patience. Today, there are not enough hours in the
day or days in the week to cover all of the threats. However, we
still are expected to have an appropriate response prepared. Realizing
that 99% of our contacts do not involve the judicious use of deadly
force, agencies began to emphasize so called “less lethal” techniques
and technology to save them from liability. We’re still waiting
for the Star Trek phasers to hit the market, but until then we’re
forced to use what we have. Let’s begin with a working description
of what is meant by the term “less lethal.” These are tools and
techniques that are developed to help us gain control of a violent
person with a low probability of causing death or serious injury.
Death can occur, but we can honestly say that we tried to avoid
it.
There are many weaponless defensive tactics programs that claim
to provide the practitioner the skills necessary to meet violence
with love. Pardon my sarcasm, but that’s not reality. Pressure point
tactics have always been suspect, but gained favor when politicians
saw it as humane and less likely to cause a lawsuit. It was abandoned
when we were able to convince the bosses that the violent folks
out there had the ability to ignore pain and really didn’t appreciate
our honest efforts to gently persuade them to stop their antisocial
behavior.
Batons, Mace, pepper spray, TASERs, long range impact weapons (
bean bags, SAGE guns, etc.), Kubotans and tools were tested, issued
and remain as options. All of these tools, along with Verbal Judo
skills of communication, remain in our arsenal and can be accessed
when appropriate. However, they can only help us if we have them
when we need them. All require manual training and even more importantly,
the right mind set to employ them when necessary. So in the parlance
of law enforcement, we have a Use of Force Continuum (or Matrix)
to choose the right level of force to use against a specific level
of threat.
During a recent training session I conducted with private security
personnel, I realized that all of those choices were mind boggling
to the class and almost to a student, they preferred martial arts
and firearms. I’m not referring to the years of discipline, ‘know
yourself before you can defeat your enemy’ type of martial arts
either. I’m talking about the Ultimate Fighting Championship stuff
they watch on television. Empty hand destruction, or shoot ‘em!
Not a very large arsenal for personal or legal protection. Being
so under prepared means that much of their game plan relies on luck.
I’d rather play the lottery.
With the help of some colleagues in the executive protection field
and some uniformed security officers and private investigators,
I floated a short survey to see if there was a great deal of emphasis
on less lethal training and equipment in the private sector. The
results were predictable, but raised some concerns as well. Here
are some of the responses I received. (I’m still receiving the responses)
1. Have you received less lethal training? 80% yes
2. What type of defense training?
a) Unarmed defensive tactics-80%
b) Pressure point tactics-40%
c) Friction lock batons-60%
d) Pepper spray-80%
e) TASER-0%
f) Long range impact weapons (Sage guns, bean bags, etc.)-0%
g) Kubotan/ Persuader-40%
h) Nunchakus- 10%
i) Other less lethal tools-60%
3. Was training documented and retained in your records? 40% yes,
60% no
4. Ever used techniques or tactics that were taught? 40% yes, 60%
no
5. Ever use deadly force? 10% yes, 90% no
My unscientific reading of these results would indicate a need
for training in less lethal techniques and technology. There are
about one in five security professionals that have little or no
training in conflict management. This concerns me because a great
majority of those also feel the need to get their Concealed Weapons
Permits. This is a very unscientific survey and was used to generate
discussion; however, most who responded were prior or current law
enforcement officers. Although no concrete conclusions can be made
by these responses, it does point to a need for additional tools
to be added to our tool box. The difference between a street fighter
and a professional is the amount of time we spend weighing the consequences
of our actions. Whether it is protecting a client or a family member,
we must be ever mindful of end results; physical, psychological
and legal. Does our training reflect reality? Or does it merely
reflect wishful thinking?
About The Author
Jerry MacCauley is a police trainer and Certified Security Trainer
in West Palm Beach, Fl. As a twenty five year police officer, many
of the training he provides has been street tested and is constantly
updated and revised to meet new and emerging threats. Mr. MacCauley
can be contacted at jerrymaccauley@hotmail.com
and comments are always welcomed and appreciated.
Article Source: JKD Street Combat
- online collection of Law Enforcement articles.
Write
an online review and share your thoughts with other readers!
|